Contact a Los Angeles Family Law Attorney at Law Offices of Warren R. Shiell today!
Call for a free consultation now 310.247.9913.


© 2009 Warren R. Shiell. All rights reserved. Los Angeles Divorce and Family Law Attorney. The information contained in
this website is an "Advertisement." It is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute legal advice. Nothing in this  
Website shall be deemed to create an Attorney-Client relationship. An Attorney-Client relationship shall only be created when
this office agrees to represent a Client and a Client signs a written retainer agreement.
Analysis: no longer the divorce capital of the world.
Law Offices of Warren R. Shiell
CONTACT US
OFFICE LOCATION

9935 South Santa Monica Blvd.
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
tel. (310) 247-9913
fax. (310) 276-0313
Your name*:
Your email address*:
Your phone number:
How can we help you?
Please briefly describe your legal issue.
I have read and understand the disclaimer.
Please put your initials.
Los Angeles Divorce and Family Law Attorney
NOTE: Fields in bold are required*
family law specialist
prenuptial agreement
enforceability of prenuptial agreements
california premarital act
warren shiell attorney
client testimonials
in the news
law offices of warren shiell
OFFICE LOCATION

9935 South Santa Monica Blvd.
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
tel. (310) 247-9913
fax. (310) 276-0313
IN THE NEWS . . .
July 3, 2009 The Times

Frances Gibb, Legal Editor

Pre-nuptial contracts have won the clear backing of the English courts
after years of suspicion and even hostility.

The landmark ruling by the Court of Appeal sends a clear message
that in future courts will regard pre-nuptial agreements made by a
couple before they wed as decisive when splitting their assets on
divorce.

The presumption will be in favour of the contract, unless there are
compelling reasons why it should be discounted — such as a lack
of independent legal advice, or a failure by one side to disclose his
or her true assets.

The ruling comes in a case involving one of Germany’s wealthiest
women and her student husband. But, as Lord Justice Thorpe made
clear, pre-nuptial contracts are not just for the rich.

“There are many instances in which mature couples, perhaps each
contemplating a second marriage, wish to regulate the future
enjoyment of their assets and perhaps to protect the interests of the children of their
earlier marriages upon dissolution of a second marriage,” he said.

“They may not unreasonably seek that clarity before making the commitment to a
second marriage.”

Why have the judges today resoundingly backed pre-nuptial contracts?

There has been growing pressure for such agreements to be given statutory force. But
despite proposals to that effect in 1998 from the Government’s law reform watchdog,
the Law Commission, responses were split — and ministers retreated.

The issue was kicked back to the Law Commission who plan a fresh review, to report in
late 2012.

Meanwhile, judges themselves have increasingly been giving greater weight to such
contracts, provided there was no obvious abuse or “manifest unfairness”.

But yesterday Lord Justice Thorpe was clearly influenced by the stark contrast with
Europe. In Germany, the contract agreed between Katrin Radmacher and Nicolas
Granatino, would have been accepted and enforced — as it would also in his native
France.

In such countries, pre-nuptial contracts are standard practice. It would seem unfair if
people could avoid the effects of a contract just by coming to England,

He added that to say in England that such contracts were void seemed “increasingly
unrealistic” and to “reflect the laws and morals of earlier generations”.

That view does not sufficiently recognise the rights of autonomous adults to order their
own future financial relationships in an age when “marriage is not generally regarded
as a sacrament and divorce is a statistical commonplace”.

And, he added, “as a society we should be seeking to reduce and not to maintain rules
of law that divide us from the majority of member states of Europe”; while warning of the
danger of “isolation” beyond Europe, in the common law world, if “we do not give
greater force and effect to ante-nuptial contracts”.

Another of the judges, Lord Justice Wilson noted that in 1998, most judges believed
“only slightly greater prominence” should be given to a pre-nuptial contract with courts
only “having regard” to them.

He too expressed concern about the present law’s lack of clarity as well as the contrast
between Britain and other countries. The underlying assumptions of our approach, he
added, were “patronising, in particular to women”.

The ruling may now go to the House of Lords for a final decision by the highest court,
which could yet decide that only Parliament can re-write the law.

Meanwhile, lawyers hailed the judgment as ground-breaking and a signal that London
could no longer be seen as “the divorce capital of the world".



Prenuptial Agreements done right!

Contact a Los Angeles Prenuptial Agreement Attorney at Law Offices of
Warren R. Shiell

Call for a free consultation now 310.247.9913.


Los Angeles Family Law Attorney

Divorce Lawyers|Attorneys Los Angeles, Beverly Hills

California Prenuptial, Prenups
Katrin Radmacher